1-877-327-4636 Alcohol and Substance
1-800-436-8477 Morning Sickness
1-888-246-5840 HIV and HIV Treatment
1-877-439-2744 Motherisk Helpline
416-813-6780 Motherisk Helpline
Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Resources
- Read more in our News Archive
Current Studies at Motherisk
Neurodevelopment of Children Exposed in-Utero to Chemotherapy for Maternal Breast Cancer (Dr. I Nulman)
Diclegis Surveillance Program Study
Diclectin Surveillance Program Study
Study seeks women between 4 and 12 weeks in their pregnancy with morning sickness (NVP)
Pregnancy in Women with Multiple Sclerosis
Environmental Exposures and Children's Health
Alcohol Use during Pregnancy
Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study
Folic Acid Before and During Pregnancy
Lamisil in Pregnancy
Meridia in Pregnancy
Autoimmune Diseases in Pregnancy Project
Fish consumption in pregnancy and fetal risks of methylmercury toxicity
Gideon Koren, MD FRCPC FACMT and John R. Bend, PhD
Because I practise in a rural area with a large number of lakes, I have patients planning pregnancy who consume relatively large amounts of fish harvested by their families. What should be my advice to them?
A recent Motherisk study has shown that fairly commonly these womens mercury levels exceed the threshold level for cognitive effects. Women should not consume excessive amounts of seafood in pregnancy (ie, no more than 2 weekly average size servings). Hair mercury level above 0.3 µg/g indicates a potentially excessive body burden.
Je pratique la médecine dans une région rurale où se trouvent beaucoup de lacs, et plusieurs de mes patientes qui planifient une grossesse consomment dassez grandes quantités de poissons pêchés par les membres de leur famille. Quels conseils devrais-je leur donner?
Une récente étude par Motherisk révèle quil est assez fréquent de trouver chez ces femmes des taux de mercure qui dépassent le seuil recommandé pour éviter des effets cognitifs. Les femmes ne devraient pas consommer des quantités excessives de poissons durant la grossesse (c.-à-d. pas plus de 2 portions moyennes par semaine). Un taux de mercure capillaire de plus de 0,3 µg/g indique une charge corporelle potentiellement excessive.
Fish and other forms of seafood are important components of healthy diets.1 Fish consumption is particularly advantageous for pregnant women because it contains relatively high concentrations of -3 polyunsaturated fatty acids not commonly found in other foods, as well as proteins that are essential for the developing fetal brain.2?4 The predominant drawback of fish consumption for expectant mothers is that some species of fish contain organic mercury at concentrations sufficient for high consumption to cause adverse developmental effects to the unborn child.5,6 Methylmercury, the form of environmental mercury most detrimental to humans, is produced from inorganic mercury by the action of anaerobic organisms that live in aquatic environments.7 Because fish have limited ability to eliminate this contaminant, methylmercury bioaccumulates at highest concentrations in muscle of large and old predatory fish.8
The best evidence for methylmercury toxicity in the fetus comes from well-publicized incidents in Minamata, Japan,9?13 and Iraq.14?17 Using data collected after the Iraqi disaster, Clarkson and colleagues defined threshold toxicologic levels associated with severe adverse effects to the fetus as low as 10 ?g/g in maternal hair.18 We recently performed a systematic review of all relevant research on humans and the effects of prenatal mercury exposure through fish consumption on neurodevelopment after fetal exposure, and have defined a lowest observable adverse effect level of hair mercury concentrations for adverse effects on child neurodevelopment resulting from fetal exposure.19
Maternal mercury content in hair was chosen as the biomarker for the extent (dose) of exposure to methylmercury because these values were reported by most studies, reflect longer exposure periods than do maternal whole blood values, and represent a less invasive method of sampling for concerned women who are planning to become pregnant. Overall, 48 articles met the inclusion criteria for our systematic review.19 Of the 48 articles, 30 were of longitudinal and 18 were of cross-sectional design. Of the 30 longitudinal articles, 11 involved work done in the original Seychelles Child Development Nutrition Study conducted in the Seychelles. Eight articles were of studies conducted in the main Faroe Islands study and 2 were from the second Faroe Islands longitudinal study. Another 2 articles described a longitudinal study conducted in the United States. Finally, 2 of the included articles were of studies conducted in New Zealand and 2 were of studies done in Poland.
All 48 of the included studies evaluated the risk of prenatal methylmercury exposure on neurodevelopment. Of the 18 cross-sectional studies, 12 articles reported on adverse dose-dependent effects. Of the 9 longitudinal studies analyzed, 5 studies found a detectable effect of methylmercury on brain function of the children.
From a comprehensive review of the data, it was apparent that neurodevelopmental abnormalities occurred in children after a range of gestational exposures from maternal consumption of highly contaminated fish: maternal hair 0.3 to 12.7 ?g/g, cord blood 0.75 to 25.7 ?g/L, maternal blood 3.8 ?g/L.19
Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted in the United States between 1999 and 2000 show that consuming fish 1 to 2 times a month corresponds to a geometric mean total mercury concentration of 0.20 ?g/g in hair and 1.05 ?g/L in blood for women of reproductive age. Consumption of fish 3 or more times a month corresponds to a geometric mean mercury content of 0.38 ?g/g in hair and 1.94 ?g/L in blood. Avoiding fish consumption corresponded to a mean total mercury content of 0.11 ?g/g in hair and 0.51 ?g/L in blood.
The threshold of 0.3 ?g/g of mercury in maternal hair was selected by us from all of the studies analyzed because in the cross-sectional studies there were different adverse neuropsychologic end points detected when maternal hair mercury levels exceeded 0.3 ?g/g.
Relevance of this threshold to Canada
Subsequently, we studied hair mercury concentrations among women of reproductive age in relation to fish intake in Ontario.20 Three groups of women were studied: women who had called the Motherisk Program for information on the reproductive safety of consuming fish during pregnancy (n = 22), a group of Japanese men and women residing in Toronto who consumed much larger than average amounts of fish (n = 23), and a group of Canadian women of reproductive age not seeking advice (n = 20). Mercury concentrations in hair samples were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Seafood consumption habits were recorded for each participant. Based on the types of fish consumed and consumption frequencies, the estimated monthly intake of mercury was calculated. Hair mercury concentrations were correlated to both the number of monthly seafood servings and the estimated ingested mercury dose.
There were significant correlations between fish servings and hair mercury (Spearman r = 0.73, P < .0001) and between amounts of consumed mercury and hair mercury concentrations (Spearman r = 0.81, P < .0001). Nearly two-thirds of the Motherisk callers, all of the Japanese women, and 15% of the Canadian women of reproductive age had hair mercury above 0.3 ?g/g, which was shown by us to be the lowest observable adverse effect level in the large systematic review of all perinatal studies.19
Because of very wide variability, general recommendations for a safe number of fish servings might not be sufficient to protect the fetus. Analysis of hair mercury might be warranted before pregnancy in selected groups of women who consume more than 12 oz of fish per week, as dietary modification can decrease body burden and ensure fetal safety.
Can Fam Physician
Vol. 56, No. 10, October 2010, pp.1001 - 1002
Copyright ? 2010 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
- Mozaffarian D, Rimm EB. Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits. JAMA 2006;296(15):1885?99. Erratum in: JAMA 2007;297 (6):590. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Makrides M, Neumann M, Simmer K, Pater J, Gibson R. Are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids essential nutrients in infancy? Lancet 1995;345(8963):1463?8. [Medline]
- Innis SM. Fatty acids and early human development. Early Hum Dev 2007;83(12):761?6. Epub 2007 Oct 24. [Medline]
- Hadders-Algra M. Prenatal long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid status: the importance of a balanced intake of docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid. J Perinat Med 2008;36(2):101?9. [Medline]
- Dovydaitis T. Fish consumption during pregnancy: an overview of the risks and benefits. J Midwifery Womens Health 2008;53(4):325?30. [Medline]
- Costa LG. Contaminants in fish: risk-benefit considerations. Arh Htg Rada Toksikol 2007;58(3):367?74. Google Scholar
- Clarkson TW, Magos L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 2006;36(8):609?62. [Medline]
- D?rea JG. Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances in fish: human health considerations. Sci Total Environ 2008;400(1?3):93?114. Epub 2008 Jul 23. [Medline]
- Harada M. Congenital Minamata disease: intrauterine methylmercury poisoning. Teratology 1978;18(2):285?8. [Medline]
- Yorifuji T, Tsuda T, Takao S, Suzuki E, Harada M. Total mercury content in hair and neurologic signs: historic data from Minamata. Epidemiology 2009;20(2):188?193. [Medline]
- Harada M. Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol 1995;25(1):1?24. [Medline]
- Ekino S, Susa M, Ninomiya T, Imamura K, Kitamura T. Minamata disease revisited: an update on the acute and chronic manifestations of methyl mercury poisoning. J Neurol Sci 2007;262(1?2):131?44. Epub 2007 Aug 2. [Medline]
- Harada M, Akagi H, Tsuda T, Kizaki T, Ohno H. Methylmercury level in umbilical cords from patients with congenital Minamata disease. Sci Total Environ 1999;234(1?3):59?62. [Medline]
- Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA, Clarkson TW, Doherty RA, Greenwood M. Intra-uterine methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Pediatrics 1974;54(5):587?95. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Greenwood MR. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. An epidemiological study of the 1971?1972 outbreak. J Appl Toxicol 1985;5(3):148?59. [Medline]
- Bakir F, Damluji SF, Amin-Zaki L, Murtadha M, Khalidi A, al-Rawi NY, et al. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science 1973;181(96):230?41. [Free Full Text]
- Rustam H, Hamdi T. Methyl mercury poisoning in Iraq. A neurological study. Brain 1974;97(3):500?10. [Medline]
- Clarkson TW, Magos L, Myers GJ. The toxicology of mercury?current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med 2003;349(18):1731?7. [Medline]
- Schoeman K, Bend JR, Hill J, Nash K, Koren G. Defining a lowest observable adverse effect hair concentrations of mercury for neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal methylmercury exposure through maternal fish consumption: a systematic review. Ther Drug Monit 2009;31(6):670?82. [Medline]
- Schoeman K, Tanaka T, Bend JR, Koren G. Hair mercury levels of women of reproductive age in Ontario, Canada: implications to fetal safety and fish consumption. J Pediatr 2010;157(1):127?31. Epub 2010 Mar 24. [Medline]